Assessing mid-career female physician burnout in the military health system: finding joy in practice after the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Rates of physician burnout increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and are expected to continue to rise. Mid-career physicians, female physicians, and military physicians have all been identified as potentially vulnerable populations to experience burnout. We examine factors associated with physician burnout among this intersectional group through a qualitative key informant interview study. METHODS: We developed a semi-structured interview guide using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Improving Joy in Work Framework and recruited military, mid-career female physicians who worked in the Military Health System(MHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic, (March 2020 -December 2021). Notes were collated and deductive thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: We interviewed a total of 22 mid-career female physician participants. Participants were between 30 and 44 years of age and 7 were mothers during the pandemic. Most were White and served in the Army. All participants discussed the importance of building rapport and having a good relationship with coworkers. All participants also described their discontentment with the new MHS GENESIS electronic health record system. An emerging theme was military pride as most participants were proud to serve in and support the military population. Additionally, participants discussed the negative impact from not feeling supported and not feeling heard by leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Much like providers in other health systems during the pandemic, MHS physicians experienced burnout. This study allowed us to gather key insights to improve policies for active duty service mid-career female military physicians. Provider inclusion, autonomy, and work culture play critical roles in future systems improvement and workforce retention.

Treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in relation to survival in the U.S. Military Health System.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a high case fatality and relatively short survival after diagnosis. Treatment is paramount to improving survival, but studies on the effects of standard treatment by surgery or chemotherapy on survival in U.S. healthcare settings is limited. Further, variability in access to care may impact treatment and outcomes for patients. We aimed to assess the relationship between standard treatment(s) and survival of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a population with access to comprehensive healthcare. METHODS: We used the Military Cancer Epidemiology (MilCanEpi) database, which includes data from the Department of Defense cancer registry and medical encounter data from the Military Health System (MHS), to study a cohort of 1408 men and women who were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1998 and 2014. Treatment with surgery or chemotherapy in relation to overall survival was examined in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 75 % of 441 patients with early-stage and 51 % of 967 patients with late-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma received treatment. In early-stage disease, surgery alone or surgery with chemotherapy were both associated with statistically significant 52 % reduced risks of death, but chemotherapy alone was not. In late-stage disease, surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, or both surgery and chemotherapy significantly reduced the risk of death by 42 %, 25 %, and 52 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings from the MHS demonstrate improved survival after treatment with surgery or surgery with chemotherapy for early- or late-stage pancreatic cancer and after chemotherapy for late-stage pancreatic cancer. In the era of immunotherapy and personalized medicine, further research on treatment and survival of pancreatic cancer in observational settings is needed.

Racialized Inequities in Knee Arthroplasty Receipt After Osteoarthritis Diagnosis in the US Military Health System.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to evaluate institutional inequities in the US Military Health System in knee arthroplasty receipt within three years of knee osteoarthritis diagnosis when accounting for other treatments received (eg, physical therapy, medications). METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, medical record data of patients (n = 29,734) who received a primary osteoarthritis diagnosis in the US Military Health System between January 2016 and January 2020 were analyzed. Data included receipt of physical therapy one year before diagnosis and up to three years after diagnosis, prediagnosis opioid and nonopioid prescription receipt, health-related factors associated with levels of racism, and the primary outcome, knee arthroplasty receipt within three years after diagnosis. RESULTS: In a generalized additive model with time-varying covariates, Asian and Pacific Islander (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.74), Black (IRR 0.52, 95%CI 0.46-0.59), and Latine (IRR 0.66, 95%CI 0.52-0.85) patients experienced racialized inequities in knee arthroplasty receipt, relative to white patients (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present sample, Asian and Pacific Islander, Black, and Latine patients were significantly less likely to receive a knee arthroplasty, relative to white patients. Taken together, system-level resources are needed to identify and address mechanisms underlying institutional inequities in knee arthroplasty receipt, such as factors related to systemic and structural, institutional, and personally mediated racism.

The response of the Military Health System (MHS) to the COVID-19 pandemic: a summary of findings from MHS reviews.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused major disruptions to the US Military Health System (MHS). In this study, we evaluated the MHS response to the pandemic to understand the impact of the pandemic response in a large, national, integrated healthcare system providing care for ~ 9 million beneficiaries. METHODS: We performed a narrative literature review of 16 internal Department of Defense (DoD) reports, including reviews mandated by the US Congress in response to the pandemic. We categorized the findings using the Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, Facilities, and Policy (DOTMLPF-P) framework developed by the DoD to assess system efficiency and effectiveness. RESULTS: The majority of the findings were in the policy, organization, and personnel categories. Key findings showed that the MHS structure to address surge situations was beneficial during the pandemic response, and the rapid growth of telehealth created the potential impact for improved access to routine and specialized care. However, organizational transition contributed to miscommunication and uneven implementation of policies; disruptions affected clinical training, upskilling, and the supply chain; and staffing shortages contributed to burnout among healthcare workers. CONCLUSION: Given its highly integrated, vertical structure, the MHS was in a better position than many civilian healthcare networks to respond efficiently to the pandemic. However, similar to the US civilian sector, the MHS also experienced delays in care, staffing and materiel challenges, and a rapid switch to telehealth. Lessons regarding the importance of communication and preparation for future public health emergency responses are relevant to civilian healthcare systems responding to COVID-19 and other similar public health crises.

Characteristics Associated With Survival in Surgically Nonresected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in the Military Health System.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages with high-case fatality. Many tumors are not surgically resectable. We aimed to identify features associated with survival in patients with surgically nonresected pancreatic cancer in the Military Health System. METHODS: We used the Military Cancer Epidemiology database to identify the Department of Defense beneficiaries aged 18 and older diagnosed with a primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 1998 and December 2014 who did not receive oncologic surgery as treatment. We used Cox Proportional Hazard regression with stepwise procedures to select the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics related to 2-year overall survival, expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Among 1148 patients with surgically nonresected pancreatic cancer, sex, race-ethnicity, marital status, and socioeconomic indicators were not selected in association with survival. A higher comorbidity count (aHR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06-1.59 for 5 vs. 0), jaundice at diagnosis (aHR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.33-1.85 vs. no), tumor grade G3 or G4 (aHR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.67 vs. G1/G2), tumor location in pancreas tail (aHR 1.49, 95% CI: 1.22-1.83 vs. head) or body (aHR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.62 vs. head), and metastases were associated with survival. Patients receiving chemotherapy (aHR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.57-0.76) had better survival compared with no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In a comprehensive health system, sociodemographic characteristics were not related to survival in surgically nonresected pancreatic cancer. This implicates access to care in reducing survival disparities in advanced pancreatic cancer and emphasizes the importance of treating patients based on clinical features.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Adolescent Pregnancies in the Military Health System.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if universal access to care for military beneficiaries improves timing of presentation to prenatal care (PNC) in adolescent and young adult (AYA) pregnancies, improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive cohort study, which assessed PNC initiation in eligible military beneficiaries: dependent daughters, active-duty women, and active-duty spouses aged 13 to 26 between January 2015 and December 2019, and subsequent adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 4,557 eligible pregnancies and 4,044 mothers aged 13 to 26. Late entry to PNC was not associated with gestational diabetes, prolonged rupture of membranes, pregnancy loss, elective abortion, substance use, or premature labor. Younger age was significantly associated with substance use, elective abortion, and sexually transmitted infection. There were 2,107 eligible newborns. There was no significant difference in gestational age at birth, incidence of prematurity, birthweight percentile, or occurrence of a neonatal intensive care unit admission based on maternal age. In comparison to published national outcomes, there was a significantly smaller occurrence of preterm (5.3% vs. 9.57-10.23%, 95% CI, 4.4-6.4%), small for gestational age (5.2% vs. 10-13%, 95% CI, 4.3-6.2%), and large for gestational age (4.8% vs. 9%, 95% CI, 4.0-5.8%) births, but a higher occurrence of neonatal intensive care unit admissions (16.9% vs. 7.8-14.4%, 95% CI, 15.4-18.6%) in infants born to military beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that expanded universal access to health care may improve AYA pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Infants born to AYA military beneficiaries have improved neonatal outcomes compared to nationally published data. These results may correlate to improved maternal access within a free or low-cost healthcare system.

Validation of ICD-9-CM codes for major genitourinary birth defects in Military Health System administrative data, 2006-2014.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Research program is dedicated to birth defects research and surveillance among military families. Here, we assess and refine the validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for selected genitourinary birth defects in the Military Health System (MHS). We additionally outline methods for the calculation of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity using a stratified sampling design. METHODS: Among military infants born from 2006 through 2014, a random sample of ICD-9-CM screen-positive cases (for six genitourinary birth defects) and screen-negative cases were selected for chart review. PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for individual defects and any included defect (i.e., overall); measures were weighted by the inverse probability of being sampled. RESULTS: Of 461,557 infants, 686 were sampled for chart review. Bladder exstrophy was accurately reported (PPV: >90%), while the accuracy of renal dysplasia, renal agenesis/hypoplasia, and hypospadias was moderate (PPVs: 66%-68%) and congenital hydronephrosis was low (PPV: 20%). Specificity and NPVs always exceeded 98%. The overall PPV was 50%; however, excluding congenital hydronephrosis screen-positive cases and requiring at least two inpatient or outpatient diagnostic codes resulted in a PPV of 85%. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of major genitourinary birth defect codes varied in MHS administrative data. The accuracy of an overall defect measure improved by omitting congenital hydronephrosis and requiring at least two diagnostic codes. Although PPV is generally useful for research, additional calculation of NPV, sensitivity, and specificity better informs the identification of appropriate selection criteria across surveillance and research settings.

Survival among lung cancer patients: comparison of the U.S. military health system and the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program by health insurance status.

PURPOSE: The U.S. military health system (MHS) provides beneficiaries with universal health care while health care access varies in the U.S. general population by insurance status/type. We divided the patients from the U.S. general population by insurance status/type and compared them to the MHS patients in survival. METHODS: The MHS patients were identified from the Department of Defense's Automated Central Tumor Registry (ACTUR). Patients from the U.S. general population were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted to compare different insurance status/type in SEER to ACTUR in overall survival. RESULTS: Compared to ACTUR patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SEER patients showed significant worse survival. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were 1.08 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.03-1.13], 1.22 (95% CI = 1.16-1.28), 1.40 (95% CI = 1.33-1.47), 1.50 (95% CI = 1.41-1.59), for insured, insured/no specifics, Medicaid, and uninsured patients, respectively. The pattern was consistently observed in subgroup analysis by race, gender, age, or tumor stage. Results were similar for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), although they were only borderline significant in some subgroups. CONCLUSION: The survival advantage of patients receiving care from a universal health care system over the patients from the general population was not restricted to uninsured or Medicaid as expected, but was present cross all insurance types, including patients with private insurance. Our findings highlight the survival benefits of universal health care system to lung cancer patients.

The Comparative Effectiveness and Provider-induced Demand Collaboration Project: A Pioneering Military-Civilian Academic Partnership to Build Health Services Research Capacity for the Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Like civilian health systems, the United States Military Health System (MHS) confronts challenges in achieving the aims of reducing cost, and improving quality, access, and safety, but historically has lacked coordinated health services research (HSR) capabilities that enabled knowledge translation and iterative learning from its wealth of data. A military-civilian academic partnership called the Comparative Effectiveness and Provider-Induced Demand Collaboration (EPIC), formed in 2011, demonstrated early proof-of-concept in using the MHS claims database for research focused on drivers of variation in health care. This existing partnership was reorganized in 2015 and its topics expanded to meet the need for HSR in support of emerging priorities and to develop current and HSR capacity within the MHS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Donabedian framework of structure, process, and outcomes was applied to support the project, through a core of principal investigators, researchers, analysts, and administrators. Within this framework, new researchers and student trainees learn foundations of HSR while performing secondary analysis of claims data from the MHS Data Repository (MDR) focusing on Health and Readiness, Pediatrics, Policy, Surgery, Trauma, and Women's Health. RESULTS: Since 2015, the project has trained 25 faculty, staff, and providers; 51 students and residents; 21 research fellows across multiple disciplines; and as of 2022, produced 107 peer-reviewed publications and 130 conference presentations, across all five themes and six cores. Research results have been incorporated into Federal and professional policy guidelines. Major research areas include opioid usage and prescribing, value-based care, and racial disparities. EPIC researchers provide direct support to MHS leaders and enabling expertise to clinical providers. CONCLUSIONS: EPIC, through its Donabedian framework and utilization of the MHS Data Repository as a research tool, generates actionable findings and builds capacity for continued HSR across the MHS. Eight years after its reorganization in 2015, EPIC continues to provide a platform for capacity building and knowledge translation.

Analysis of Telehealth Equity Within the Military Health System During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: Telehealth care expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, although previous studies show racial, gender, and socioeconomic inequalities in its usage. Racial disparities are known to be mitigated in the Military Health System (MHS), whose 9.6 million beneficiaries are universally insured and nationally representative. This study investigated whether known disparities in telehealth usage were mitigated in the MHS. Methods: This study performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of TRICARE telehealth claims data from January 2020 to December 2021. Beneficiaries aged 0 to 64 years were identified with Common Procedural Terminology code modifiers 95, GT, and GQ, which indicated procedures that were delivered through either synchronous or asynchronous telecommunication services. Visits were defined as one encounter per patient per day. Analyses included descriptive statistics of patient demographics, number of telehealth visits, and differences between military-provided and private sector care (PSC). Military rank was used as a proxy for socioeconomic status (SES), generally combining income, education, and occupation type. Results: A total of 917,922 beneficiaries received telehealth visits during the study period: 25% in direct care, 80% in PSC, and 4% in both care settings. The majority of visits were received by females (57%) and associated with a Senior Enlisted rank (66%). The visits by racial category were proportional to the percentage of each category in the population. The lowest number of visits was for those older than 60 years, potentially receiving Medicare instead, and those associated with Junior Enlisted rank, a potential disparity that may also reflect access to leave or smaller family size. Conclusions and Relevance: Within the MHS, telehealth visits were equitable by race, in line with previous findings, but not by gender, SES, or age. Findings by gender are reflected in the greater U.S. population. Further research is needed to assess and address potential disparities associated with Junior Enlisted rank as proxy for low SES.

Healthcare Utilization Following Hemipelvectomy or Hip Disarticulation in the Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Amputations at the hip and pelvic level are often performed secondary to high-energy trauma or pelvic neoplasms and are frequently associated with a prolonged postoperative rehabilitation course that involves a multitude of health care providers. The purpose of this study was to examine the health care utilization of patients with hip- and pelvic-level amputations that received care in the U.S. Military Health System. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a hip- or pelvic-level amputation in the Military Health System between 2001 and 2017. We compiled and reviewed all inpatient and outpatient encounters during three time points: (1) 3 months pre-amputation to 1 day pre-amputation, (2) the day of amputation through 12 months post-amputation, and (3) 13-24 months post-amputation. Health care utilization was defined as the average number of encounter days/admissions for each patient. Concomitant diagnoses following amputation including post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 106 individuals with hip- and pelvic-level amputations were analyzed (69 unilateral hip disarticulation, 6 bilateral hip disarticulations, 27 unilateral hemipelvectomy, 2 bilateral hemipelvectomies, and 2 patients with a hemipelvectomy and contralateral hip disarticulation). Combat trauma contributed to 61.3% (n = 65) of all amputations. During the time period of 3 months pre-amputation, patients had an average of 3.8 encounter days. Following amputation, health care utilization increased in both the year following amputation and the time period of 13-24 months post-amputation, averaging 170.8 and 77.4 encounter days, respectively. Patients with trauma-related amputations averaged more total encounter days compared to patients with disease-related amputations in the time period of 12 months following amputation (203.8 vs.106.7, P < .001) and the time period of 13-24 months post-amputation (92.0 vs. 49.0, P = .005). PTSD (P = .02) and traumatic brain injuries (P < .001) were more common following combat-related amputations. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the increased health care resource demand following hip- and pelvic-level amputations in a military population, particularly for those patients who sustained combat-related trauma. Additionally, patients with combat-related amputations had significantly higher rates of concomitant PTSD and traumatic brain injury. Understanding the extensive needs of this unique patient population helps inform providers and policymakers on the requirements for providing high-quality care to combat casualties.

Assessing Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenetic Testing in the Military Health System.

INTRODUCTION: Response to medications can differ widely among individual patients. Adverse drug reactions can lead to serious morbidity and mortality. Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing can predict responses to medications and increased risks of adverse events where the genetic basis is understood. Several published manuscripts suggest positive impacts of systematic preemptive PGx testing. However, few studies have been conducted on PGx implementation in the Military Health System (MHS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of adult beneficiaries in a primary care clinic at a large military treatment facility was conducted in 2022. Participants underwent PGx genotyping of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genes at the Defense Health Agency Genetics Reference Laboratory. Participant medication lists were compared to the current Clinical Pharmacogenetic Implementation Consortium (CPIC) PGx gene-drug guidelines to assess potential actionability of these results. RESULTS: Genotyping of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 in 165 MHS beneficiaries (mean age: 65 years) revealed that 81.2% of participants had at least one abnormal PGx finding. Among those with an abnormal PGx result, 65% were taking a medication listed on the CPIC website with an association with the particular gene in which the finding was identified. In addition, 78% of all of the participants in the study were taking at least one medication that is metabolized by CYP2C19 or CYP2D6 with associated CPIC guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacogenetic testing for CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 identified a substantial proportion of MHS patients at a single center who could benefit from evaluation of current medication regimens based on the CPIC guidelines. Individualized medical management may be warranted to a greater degree than previously recognized based on the findings given possible differences in medication metabolism. Many MHS beneficiaries already take medications metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP2D6, and a substantial proportion may be at risk for preventable adverse events for medications metabolized by these enzymes. While preliminary, a large number of actionable polymorphisms among a relatively small set of individuals taking at-risk medications suggest that implementing PGx testing in clinical practice may be beneficial in the MHS with appropriate clinical infrastructure.

A Regional Analysis of Low Back Pain Treatments in the Military Health System.

STUDY DESIGN: Claims-based analysis of cohorts of TRICARE Prime beneficiaries. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of utilization of 5 low back pain (LBP) treatments (physical therapy (PT), manual therapy, behavioral therapies, opioid, and benzodiazepine prescription) across catchment areas and assess their association with the resolution of LBP. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Guidelines support focusing on nonpharmacologic management for LBP and reducing opioid use. Little is known about patterns of care for LBP across the Military Health System. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Incident LBP diagnoses were identified data using the International Classification of Diseases ninth revision before October 2015 and 10th revision after October 2015; beneficiaries with "red flag" diagnoses and those stationed overseas, eligible for Medicare, or having other health insurance were excluded. After exclusions, there were 159,027 patients remained in the final analytic cohort across 73 catchment areas. Treatment was defined by catchment-level rates of treatment to avoid confounding by indication at the individual level; the primary outcome was the resolution of LBP defined as an absence of administrative claims for LBP during a 6 to 12-month period after the index diagnosis. RESULTS: Adjusted rates of opioid prescribing across catchment areas ranged from 15% to 28%, physical therapy from 17% to 39%, and manual therapy from 5% to 26%. Multivariate logistic regression models showed a negative and marginally significant association between opioid prescriptions and LBP resolution (odds ratio: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93-1.00; P = 0.051) but no significant association with physical therapy, manual therapy, benzodiazepine prescription, or behavioral therapies. When the analysis was restricted to the subset of only active-duty beneficiaries, there was a stronger negative association between opioid prescription and LBP resolution (odds ratio: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial variability across catchment areas within TRICARE for the treatment of LBP. Higher rates of opioid prescription were associated with worse outcomes.

Health Care Utilization After Major Limb Loss in Adults (18-64) Receiving Care in the Military Health System From 2001 to 2017.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize and quantify health care utilization of Military Health System beneficiaries with major limb loss. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Military treatment facilities and civilian health care facilities that accept TRICARE insurance across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total 5950 adult Military Health System beneficiaries with major limb amputation(s) acquired between January 1st, 2001, and September 30th, 2017 (N=5950). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This study was an exploratory analysis designed to identify common care specialties, services, and devices utilized by Military Health System beneficiaries with major limb loss. RESULTS: Most beneficiaries were retirees/dependents (63.3%), men (73.1%), and had a single amputation (88.7%), with a mean age of 42 years. Differences between beneficiary categories were found. Active-duty service members used a larger proportion of inpatient, emergency, primary care, physical and occupational therapy, prosthetics and orthotics, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and psychiatry services than retirees/dependents. Most common procedures included "revision of amputation stump" (57.2%) for the active-duty population and "other amputation below knee" (24.3%) for the retirees/dependents. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the rehabilitation trajectories of beneficiaries receiving treatment for major limb loss in military and civilian care settings. The results could inform staffing decisions and training programs for military treatment facilities, American trauma centers, rehabilitation hospitals, and outpatient health care providers treating individuals with amputation.

The Military Health System: Minimizing Disparities in Breast Cancer Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The Military Health System (MHS) is a universal health care system, in which health care disparities are theoretically minimized. This study aimed to identify disparities and assess their impact on the initiation of timely treatment for breast cancer within a universally insured population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the treatment of female breast cancer patients ≥18 years of age within the MHS from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. Incident breast cancer was defined as ≥2 breast cancer diagnoses without a prior diagnosis of breast cancer during the three continuous years before index diagnosis. Time from index diagnosis to initial treatment was calculated and dichotomized as receiving treatment within a clinically acceptable time course. Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Among the 30,761 female breast cancer patients identified in the MHS, only 6% of patients had a prolonged time to initial treatment. Time to initial treatment decreased during the study period from a mean (SD) of 63.2 (152.0) days in 2014 to 37.1 (28.8) days in 2018 (P < 0.0001). Age, region, and military characteristics remained significantly associated with receiving timely treatment even after the adjustment of confounders. Patients 70-79 years old were twice as likely as 18-39 years olds to receive timely treatment (RR: 2.0100, 95% CI, 1.52-2.6563, P < 0.0001). Senior officers and their dependents were more likely to receive timely initial treatment compared to junior enlisted patients and their dependents (RR: 1.5956, 95% CI, 1.2119-2.1005, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: There have been significant improvements in the timely initiation of breast cancer treatment within the MHS. However, demographic and socioeconomic disparities can be identified that affect the timely initiation of therapy.

Recommendations for a Military Health System Auditory Blast Injury Prevention Standard.

INTRODUCTION: Although existing auditory injury prevention standards benefit warfighters, the Department of Defense could do more to understand and address auditory injuries (e.g., hearing loss, tinnitus, and central processing deficits) among service members. The Blast Injury Prevention Standards Recommendation (BIPSR) Process is designed to address the needs of all the Military Services for biomedically valid Military Health System (MHS) Blast Injury Prevention Standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through the BIPSR Process, stakeholders provided their intended uses and requested functionalities for an MHS Blast Injury Prevention Standard. The BIPSR Process established a broad-based, non-advocacy panel of auditory injury Subject Matter Expert (SME) Panel with members drawn from industry, academia, and government. The SME Panel selected evaluation factors, weighted priorities, and then evaluated the resulting candidate MHS Auditory Blast Injury Prevention Standards against the evaluation criteria. The SME Panel members provided rationales for their decisions, documented discussions, and used iterative rounds of feedback to promote consensus building among members. The BIPSR Process used multi-attribute utility theory to combine members' evaluations and compare the candidate standards. RESULTS: The SME Panel identified and collated information about existing auditory injury datasets to identify gaps and promote data sharing and comprehensive evaluations of standards for preventing auditory blast injury. The panel evaluated the candidate standards and developed recommendations for an MHS Blast Injury Prevention Standard. CONCLUSIONS: The BIPSR Process illuminated important characteristics, capabilities, and limitations of candidate standards and existing datasets (e.g., limited human exposure data to evaluate the validity of injury prediction) for auditory blast injury prevention. The evaluation resulted in the recommendation to use the 8-hour Equivalent Level (LAeq8hr) as the interim MHS Auditory Blast Injury Prevention Standard while the community performs additional research to fill critical knowledge gaps.

Racialized and beneficiary inequities in medication to treat opioid use disorder receipt within the US Military Health System.

BACKGROUND: Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) can be critical to managing opioid use disorder (OUD). It is unknown the extent to which US Military Health System (MHS) patients diagnosed with OUD receive MOUD. METHODS: Healthcare records of MHS-enrolled active duty and retired service members (N = 13,334) with a new (index) OUD diagnosis were included between 2018 and 2021, without 90-day pre-index MOUD receipt were included. Elastic net logistic and Cox regressions evaluated care- and system-level factors associated with 1-year MOUD receipt (primary outcome) and time-to-receipt. RESULTS: Only 9% of patients received MOUD 1-year post-index; only 4% received MOUD within 14 days. Black patients (OR for receipt 0.38, 95% CI 0.30-0.49), Latinx patients (OR for receipt 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.59), and patients whose race and ethnicity was Other (OR for receipt 0.52, 95%CI 0.35, 0.77) experienced lower MOUD access (all p < 0.001). Retirees were more likely to receive MOUD relative to active duty service members (OR for receipt 1.81, 95%CI 1.52, 2.16, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Institutional racism in MOUD prescribing, combined with the overall low rates of MOUD receipt after OUD diagnosis, highlight the need for evidence-based, multifaceted, and multilevel approaches to OUD care in the Military Health System. Without clear Defense Health Agency policy, including the designation of responsible entities, transparent and ongoing evaluation and responsiveness using standardized methodology, and resourced programming and public health campaigns, MOUD rates will likely remain poor and inequitable.